The next n+1 – a summary of wishes


This post is perhaps more for me than for the rare reader out there that finds my intermittent blog ๐Ÿ˜‰

I'd like my new n+1 to be capable of exploring a bit more off-road than this...

I’d like my new n+1 to be capable of exploring a bit more off-road than this…

But in summary

Weight: This actually is the most critical one, as the heaviness of the Raven was discouraging me from riding. Having re-discovered the Marin, that’s been partially alleviated, but even the Marin could be lighter. So 15kg (as on my Raven) is far too heavy. 11.5kg (as on my Marin) is the absolute max, but if I’m spending money, it doesn’t make sense to buy something that doesn’t improve noticeably on that – so say 10kg max for a new bike. The Tactic, which I love, but won’t go off-road and won’t take panniers is 7.5kg. The Marin feels much lighter than half-way between the Tactic and Raven!

On or off-road: If I’m honest I think it’s a serious limit to not be able to adventure off-road to some extent, especially as CX bikes are so capable on that front. I accept it won’t be able to cope with as rough terrain as a true MTB, but CX bikes appear to have the perfect weight to strength compromise to enable moderate off-road exploration. So I’m reluctant to give ground on that with a pure road bike.

Image of Reuben hopping across the Geldie Burn (in the Cairngorms) to keep one foot dry!

This would be much rougher terrain than I’d expect the n+1 to cope with though!

Ability to carry kit: I’m not the lightest of packers and I’ve never understood how road racers go all day with nothing other than a bike pump and a couple of puncture patches for spare kit. But it seems that bikepacking kit is at least worth investigating further, if that can spare me the problems of a rear rack.

Frame materials: I am worried about carbon fibre. It’s relatively fragile to unexpected knocks and I can’t say I’ve had none on the Raven or the Marin. And it’s only expected to last for 7 years, which seems a bit short. (For example there’s still plenty of resale value on my Raven at 7-8 yrs old!) But it’s oh so light ๐Ÿ™‚ Aluminium seems to have all the disadvantages of carbon – relatively fragile, hard to mend, short life, but without the advantage of really light weight. Steel seems wonderful – if it can be found in a light enough frame – a rarity these days, although my Marin proves it can be done. Titanium – is still an unknown for me. Must find out more on that, but wouldn’t surprise me if it’s similar to aluminium.

Wheel overlap: Test riding the Jamis threw up a really unexpected curve ball. Wheel overlap – ie the risk of toes catching the wheel as it turns. It was a very narrow clearance with my feet clipped in – out of clips (as I often do on rougher terrain, coming up to a gate, somewhere I know I’m going to stop) the risks of feet catching seemed too large to accept. 650B tyre size might be the way forward on that, if geometry is too compromised on a CX bike.

Solutions:

  • Try out bikepacking kit to see if it can replace panniers – including for a multiday trip (opens up many more options for an ideally road-biased-but-not-exclusively-so bike)
  • Investigate 650B tyres on a CX bike (might stop wheel overlap but might be hard to find)
  • Investigate frame building from someone like Richard Hallet or Mercian Cycles (get exactly what I’m after – but probably more costly than I intended)
  • Investigate a titanium CX bike
  • Investigate what components can be upgraded on the Marin